New Developments: Joslin Smith Case Testimony - 22 March 2025

#truecrimestories #truecrimepodcast #capetown #medschool #forensicanalysis Witness Laurentia Lombaard Overcomes Health Scare to Continue Testimony in Joshlin Smith Trial Laurentia Lombaard returned to the witness stand on Thursday after experiencing two illnesses the previous day. As proceedings commenced in the third week of the Joshlin Smith trial, there was uncertainty regarding Lombaard’s ability to testify on Thursday. This arose from her falling ill twice while in the witness box on Wednesday. Prior to 11:00 AM, Lombaard requested the court’s permission to excuse herself. Judge Nathan Erasmus informed the courtroom of Lombaard’s illness and requested an adjournment. He stated that if Lombaard was unable to continue, the day would be shortened, and the matter would be postponed to the following day. However, 45 minutes later, Lombaard entered the courtroom prepared to resume cross-examination. She was still being questioned by Fanie Harmse, the lawyer for Jacquen ‘Boeta’ Appollis. During cross-examination, Lombaard experienced another bout of illness. The court adjourned for the day. However, on Thursday morning, Lombaard was in the witness box, ready to proceed. Judge Erasmus advised her to relax, listen attentively to the questions, and ensure her comprehension. Lombaard also addressed Judge Erasmus, informing him that she had a doctor’s note for his reference. She stated, “I have a document to present to my Lord from the physician.” As the note was presented to the judge without objection from the legal counsel, Judge Erasmus acknowledged its contents. He stated that the note documented Lombaard’s condition and provided assurance that she would be able to continue testifying today. Furthermore, Judge Erasmus clarified that he would refrain from disclosing Lombaard’s medical issue in court records.  #truecrimestories #truecrimepodcast #capetown #medschool #forensicanalysis M.A.I Medical Research Institute - WE ARE Committed to giving you news that is accurate comment that is fair and programming that is not harmful to children, does not amount to hate speech and is transformative and informative. M.A.I's research is based on - (Copyright Free) - Articles compiled, reviewed and published by the team itself … In South Africa,... the Copyright Act of 1978 codifies the concept of "fair dealing" as a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted works without permission. Fair dealing is permitted for certain purposes, including: Research and study: For personal or academic use, as long as it's not for commercial gain Criticism and review: To critique or review a work, as long as it's transformative and doesn't replace the original work News reporting: To report current events, as long as it's proportionate and doesn't harm the original work's value Teaching: For teaching, scholarship, or research Judicial proceedings: For judicial proceedings or a report of judicial proceedings Incidental inclusion: In a broadcast or sound recording Fair dealing is different from "fair use", which is a legal doctrine that's more common in countries like the United States. Fair use allows for a broader range of uses.Please contact us first if you feel you or a medical journal that you represent has overlap with us, and arranges can be made to mediate this issue. For Business inquiries, email us.